Juckniess v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• party has right to be present and participate in proceedings even if incompetent to testify; therefore, court erred in denying continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jordan v. Butler
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1968-02-23· cited 21×
• Gutierrez v. Gutierrez
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1996-12-17· cited 8×
• Cox v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1955-02-18· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jaffe v. Lilienthal
  California Supreme Court· 1894-01-26· cited 32×
• Estate of Townsend v. Townsend
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1904-01-19· cited 22×
• Graves ex rel. Cayce v. Graves
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1914-03-03· cited 15×
• Johnson v. Dinsmore
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1881-01-15· cited 8×
• Mathews v. Willoughby
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1890-04-23· cited 5×