Jubitz Corporation, V State Department Of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “Montana has adopted the clear statutory language of section 27 of the Revised Uniform Act, leaving no question as to whether a court can determine paternity as part of a URESA action in this state”
• dissent distinguishing opposing authority and pointing out that the classification only involves children that already have presumed fathers, and presumed fathers are still legally required to support their children
• dissent distinguishing opposing authority and pointing out that the classification only involves children that already have presumed fathers, and presumed fathers are still legally required to support their children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).