Juarez v. Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, ‘‘so long as the investigation continues to gather evidence for a possible future criminal case, and that case would be jeopardized by the premature release of that evidence, [the exemption] applies’’
• noting that district court “acts within its ‘broad discretion’ by declining to conduct such [in camera] review”
• holding government’s declaration, which explained the way in which exempt information and nonexempt information were intertwined, was entitled to presumption of good faith
• holding government's declaration, which explained the way in which exempt information and nonexempt information were intertwined, was entitled to presumption of good faith
• noting that a court “may rely on government affidavits that show with reasonable specificity why documents withheld pursuant to a valid exemption cannot be further segregated”
• noting that a court “may rely on government affidavits that show with reasonable specificity why documents withheld pursuant to a valid exemption cannot be further segregated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).