Juanita Stockwell v. City and County of San Francis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]emonstrating commonality does not 9 require proof that the putative class will prevail on whatever common question it identifies.”
• finding commonality where the class would “rise and fall together” based 41 USCA4 Appeal: 21-2116 Doc: 60 Filed: 01/24/2023 Pg: 42 of 43 on whether their evidence—a statistical study—showed disparate impact
• “We must police the bounds of our jurisdiction vigorously [concerning Rule 23(f) appeals] as elsewhere.”
• “We must police the bounds of our jurisdiction vigorously here as elsewhere, and so may not ourselves venture into merits issues unnecessary to the Rule 23 issue before us.” (citation omitted)
• “Rule 23(a)(2) requires a single significant question of law 5 or fact.” (cleaned up)
• \[T]here is no tort without an actionable injury caused by the defendant's wrongful act.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).