Juan Zhu v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Bankruptcy Code section 1507 establishes the fairness considerations that courts must examine in determining whether to grant comity to a foreign court’s order
• recognizing and enforcing Brazilian plan that included substantive consolidation and that authorized distributions with priorities that differ from those provided in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
• holding that a request for relief by a foreign representative (1) to enforce a foreign reorganization plan and confirmation decision even where the relief provided in the plan conflicts or is inconsistent with the relief available in a Chapter 11 plan, and (2
• noting that it remains to be seen whether the “analysis crafted by the Vitro court [as to Sections 1521 and 1507] is embraced by other courts.”
• finding that granting an order that will “enforc[e] a foreign confirmation order, including the request for an injunction of acts in contravention of such order” is relief available under section 1521
• finding that relief to enforce Brazilian plan is proper under Section 1521

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).