Juan Verdin v. Michael O'Leary and Neil F. Hartigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the con stitutional right to presence is not implicated per se by a judge’s ex parte communication with a deliberating jury
• noting if “state cases rest on federal constitutional grounds, they must be accepted on that basis by the habeas court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).