Skip to main content
· 2/6/2003

Juan Rodriguez v. Eugene McAdory

Citations

  • 318 F.3d 733
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2031
  • 2003 WL 255400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the state court’s plain error review of the petitioner’s claims “did not undo his procedural default”
  • concluding state law procedural ruling is independent for federal habeas pur‐ poses unless it was “entirely dependent on the merits”
  • “Although a state court’s review of whether an error is ‘plain’ often entails at least limited review of the merits, that limited review is at most ‘entangled’ with the merits and certainly not ‘entirely dependent on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Manton, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.