· 8/10/2023
Juan Ramirez v. the State of Texas
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The First Amendment does not prevent the admission in evidence of a defendant's political views to demonstrate the defendant's relevant motive in a prosecution for treason
- claim that court erred in “allowing the jury to have a typewritten copy of the court’s charge” did not “warrant the inference of unfairness or irregularity in the trial”
- claim that court erred in “allowing the jury to have a typewritten copy of the court’s charge” did not “warrant the inference of unfairness or irregularity in the trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.