Juan Ordaz v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that IJ’s failure to inform alien of eligibility for relief from removal violated due process because regulation imposing duty to do so was “mandatory”
• concluding that because “Ubaldo-Figueroa had a plausible claim for relief ... the IJ’s unconstitutional failure to inform him that he was eligible ... prejudiced him”
• concluding that because “Ubaldo-Figueroa had a plausible claim for relief ... the IJ’s unconstitutional failure to inform him that he was eligible ... prejudiced him”
• holding that the failure to inform an immigrant of possible eligibility for relief from removal is a denial of due process that invalidates the underlying deportation proceeding
• holding that the failure to inform an immigrant of possible eligibility for relief from removal is a denial of due process that invalidates the underlying deportation proceeding
• stating that the defendant must show that he had a plausible ground for relief from deportation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).