Juan McGee v. Carol Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[w]hen a medical professional acts in his pro- fessional capacity,” the professional’s treatment is judged against a highly deferential substantial departure standard
• finding that the defendants’ “meaningful and ongoing assessment of a patient’s condition [was] the antithesis of “deliberate indifference’
• finding that “meaningful and ongoing assessment of a patient’s condition is the antithesis of ‘deliberate indifference’”
• explaining that “non-medical professional defendants” are “entitled to rely on the medical professionals’ determination” absent an indication that the medical care is insufficient
• finding that the defendants’ “meaningful and ongoing assessment of a patient’s condition [was] the antithesis of ‘deliberate indifference’”
• explaining that “[w]hen a medical professional acts in his pro- fessional capacity,” the professional’s treatment is judged against a highly deferential substantial departure standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).