Juan Gallegos v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying exacting scrutiny to a law that required an unpaid lobbyist “to reveal his identity and divulge his activities”
• collecting cases in which the Supreme Court “credited anti- corruption rationales . . . despite the limitations . . . place[d] on speech”
• “We accordingly vacate the judgment and remand for further consideration of Calzone’s request for a permanent injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).