JUAN B. OLIVA and MIGDALIA P. OLIVA v. GENERAL MACHINE CO. OF NEW JERSEY, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where plaintiff sought to import factual findings from a voluminous prior civil RICO action, the Second Circuit “agree[d] with the district court that it is virtually impossible to determine which, if any, factual findings were necessary to the finding of liability”
• noting the general “judicial wariness of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel”
• noting the general “judicial wariness of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel”
• noting the general “judicial wariness of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel”
• noting the general “judicial wariness of nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel”
• “[T]he identicality standard does not require either that the two cases have the same scope or that they involve the same causes of action. Rather, it is met . . . so long as the issues are identical.” (emphasis in original) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).