Skip to main content
· 5/4/2006

Juan Armstrong, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Lasalle Bank National Association

Citations

  • 446 F.3d 728
  • 37 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2256
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11077
  • 2006 WL 1171907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although employee stock ownership plans may be inherently risky because they invest in only one stock, such funds are permissible
  • reversing summary judgment in favor of ERISA fiduciaries in the absence of evidence that fiduciaries considered how to balance plan participants’ interests
  • reversing district court summary judgment order on triable issue of fact of whether ESOP trustee exercised prudence in stock valuation for purposes of setting a redemption price
  • reversing summary judgment in favor of ERISA fiduciaries in the absence of evidence that fiduciaries considered how to balance plan participants’ interests
  • reversing district court summary judgment order on triable issue of fact of whether ESOP trustee exercised prudence in stock valuation for pur‐ poses of setting a redemption price
  • “A [fiduciary] who simply ignores changed 13 circumstances that have increased the risk of loss to the trust’s beneficiaries is imprudent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.