Juan Armenta-Lagunas v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the petitioner did not satisfy the realistic probability test when he presented only hypotheticals as proof of nongeneric application
• “To satisfy the actus reus element, the statute of conviction simply must require an active interference with proceedings of a tribunal or investigation, or action or threat of action against those who would cooperate in the process of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).