Skip to main content
· 1/5/2001

JSG Trading Corp. v. Department of Agriculture

Citations

  • 235 F.3d 608
  • 344 U.S. App. D.C. 236
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 98
  • 2001 WL 15198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Secretary’s revocation of a PACA license in commercial bribery cases provided “ample notice that commercial bribes may result in revocation”
  • stating that substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion when taking into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.”
  • affirming the Secretary’s description of “a duty of produce sellers not to corrupt agents and employees of their buyers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Rogers, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.