Skip to main content
· 10/6/2014

Jsc Transmashholding v. Miller

Citations

  • 70 F. Supp. 3d 516
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141596
  • 2014 WL 4960993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to entertain factual arguments regarding the “alleged injustice” when addressing an unjust enrichment claim at the pleading stage
  • “While this benefit was conferred on [the defendant] through [a third-party], the theory of unjust enrichment could apply to indirect payments conveyed through a third-party intermediary”
  • “While this benefit was conferred on [the defendant] through [a third-party], the theory of unjust 24 enrichment could apply to indirect payments conveyed through a third-party intermediary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Reggie B. Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.