J.S. v. L.S.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 1135
Syllabus
The trial court erred when it conducted independent factfinding on L.S.'s proffered evidence without affording him an opportunity to respond, depriving L.S. of a full hearing within the meaning of R.C. 3113.31 on the petition for a CPO. Additionally, to the extent the trial court reviewed evidence submitted by J.S. without affording L.S. an opportunity to review and respond to the evidence, the trial court erred.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- J.S. v. L.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-19· cited 7×
- C.T. v. N.Y.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-29· cited 5×
- Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C. v. HumphreysOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-09· cited 4×
- C.W. v. J.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-09· cited 4×
- Setters v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-30· cited 2×
- Greenlawn Cos. v. CantyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-05· cited 2×
- Evans v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-24· cited 2×
- Martin v. BussOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-03· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 162×
- Parrish v. ParrishOhio Supreme Court· 2002-04-10· cited 42×
- J.W. v. D.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-30· cited 21×
- Martin v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-24· cited 17×
- State v. BayliffOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-08-23· cited 11×
- D.M.W. v. E.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-06· cited 11×
- Tyler v. TylerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-21· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Harris v. Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-26· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.