Skip to main content
· 6/17/2024

J.S. v. Conkle

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 2330

Syllabus

CIVIL – the trial court overruled Appellant's objections and adopted a magistrate's decision granting Appellee's Petition for a Civil Stalking Protection Order (\CSPO\) abuse of discretion manifest weight of the evidence the CSPO was filed in accordance with R.C. 2903.214 R.C. 2903.211(A)(1) and (2)(a)(b) \knowingly\ R.C. 2901.22(B) \pattern of conduct\ R.C. 2903.211(D)(1) \physical harm\ R.C. 2901.01(A)(3) \mental distress\ R.C. 2903.211(D)(2) given the deference we must afford the trial court's judgment, as well as its credibility determinations when presented with any conflicting testimony, the trial court committed no error, based on the evidence presented, including Appellee's exhibits, in granting Appellee's Petition for a CSPO against Appellant judgment affirmed.

Judges: Dickey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.