J.R. v. Gloria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding state agency employee were qualifiedly immune from plaintiffs’ negligence claim against her in her individual capacity
• noting that negligence alone does not satisfy Lewis standard
• discussing a state-created “special relationship” in the context of a substantive due process claim
• brackets, quotation marks, and citation 5 As this order is limited to Savaria’s motion, and Censabella has neither filed a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(ii
• allegations that state officials placed two minors in a foster home where they faced sexual and physical abuse did not shock the conscience, even where state officials’ conduct fell short of explicit regulatory requirements
• “[N]egligence, without more, is simply insufficient to meet the conscience-shocking standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).