J.R. Stover v. Progress Community Corrections Center, Waynesburg, PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “general statements such as ‘undue stress’ and ‘humiliation’” were insufficient to allege severe emotional distress
• concluding IIED claim failed as a matter of law where plaintiff “confines his description of his injuries to general statements such as ‘undue stress’ and ‘humiliation’”
• granting motion' to dismiss IIED claim based on allegations that plaintiff “was handcuffed for up to two hours” and threatened with criminal action
• dismissing intentional infliction of emotional distress claim based on plaintiff’s arrest, including two hours in handcuffs, and subsequent “threatened criminal action” after the fact
• granting motion to dismiss intentional infliction of emotional distress claim based on allegations that plaintiff “was handcuffed for up to two hours” and threatened with criminal action
• granting motion to dismiss intentional infliction of emotional distress claim based on allegations that plaintiff “was handcuffed for up to two hours” and threatened with criminal action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).