Skip to main content
· 2/21/2013

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Asia Pulp & Paper Co.

Citations

  • 707 F.3d 853
  • 84 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1416
  • 2013 WL 627253
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “wild card” 10 || exemption is applicable to “any” property and “‘[A]ny’ means any” 11 to the statutory amount
  • declining to extend the collateral order doctrine and noting that Mohawk’s alternatives for review are adequate to vindicate rights
  • declining to extend the collateral order doctrine and noting that Mohawk’s alternatives for review are adequate to vindicate rights
  • declining to extend the collateral order doctrine and noting that Mohawk’s alternatives for review are adequate to vindicate rights
  • finding the notice of appeal sufficient where, among other considerations, the opposing party did “not claim to have been misled”
  • resolving dispute about mer‐ its of claims on promissory note even though district court in post‐judgment proceedings had issued later asset discovery order that was itself not immediately appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.