Joyner v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in another context, the common law \no work no pay\ rule for public employees, which protects a public entity from paying for services it does not receive, no longer applicable in modern labor jurisprudence
• acknowledging importance of stare decisis, but declaring that “this Court must not abdicate its responsibility to reevaluate the rules of the common law to determine if those rules remain in consonance with society’s needs”
• acknowledging importance of stare decisis, but declaring that \this Court must not abdicate its responsibility to reevaluate the rules of the common law to determine if those rules remain in consonance with society's needs\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).