· 2/4/1992
Joyner v. Monier Roof Tile, Inc.
Citations
- 784 F. Supp. 872
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1268
- 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,472
- 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 830
- 1992 WL 25657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts ordinarily apply new legislation in pending cases absent manifest injustice, and that “even where the inter[vening] law does not explicitly recite that it is to be applied to pending cases, it is to be given recognition and effect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.