Skip to main content
· 2/4/1992

Joyner v. Monier Roof Tile, Inc.

Citations

  • 784 F. Supp. 872
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1268
  • 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,472
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 830
  • 1992 WL 25657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts ordinarily apply new legislation in pending cases absent manifest injustice, and that “even where the inter[vening] law does not explicitly recite that it is to be applied to pending cases, it is to be given recognition and effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.