Joyner v. International Real Estate Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the trial court did not err in granting the defendant's motion [for summary judgment] because the plaintiff failed to present evidence in opposition to the defendant's [contentions].\
• continuing course of conduct cannot be the failure of the alleged tort feasor to notify plaintiff of his wrongdoing
• \A `material' fact has been defined adequately and simply as a fact which will make a difference in the result of the case.\
• before the need for an exclusion arises, there must first be coverage within the defined scope of the insurance policy in question
• before need for exclusion arises, there must be coverage within defined scope of policy
• losses caused by nutrition line that disconnected; “[t]he only reasonable interpretation of the exclusionary provision is that it specifically excludes ... accidents caused by or resulting from ‘medical or surgical treatment.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).