Skip to main content
· 1/16/1996

Joyce v. Suffolk County

Citations

  • 911 F. Supp. 92
  • 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 935
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 596
  • 1996 WL 29006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that police officer candidate with uncorrected vision of 20/200 was not disabled
  • noting plaintiffs concession that “he has never been limited in any activity by his eyesight or blood pressure”
  • employee not handicapped; poor eyesight corrected by eyeglasses and high blood pressure controlled with medication are not physical impairments that substantially limit major life activities
  • employee not handicapped; poor eyesight corrected by eyeglasses and high blood pressure controlled with medication are not physical impairments that substantially limit major life activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.