Joyce Ratliff v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a written expression of disagreement “abates finality of the Board decision ... until ... the Board Chairman determines the status of the document ... and notifies the claimant of his determination”
• holding that a written expression of disagreement \abates finality of the Board decision . . . until . . . 2 the Board Chairman determines the status of the document . . . and notifies the claimant of his determination\
• noting that \the VA Adjudication Procedures Manual Rewrite (M21–1MR) requires the RO to act upon receipt of submissions\ expressing disagreement with Board decisions
• “[I]f the Secretary returns the written disagreement to the claimant ... the Board decision ... is now deemed final and ... the claimant has a new 120-day appeal period beginning with the date of the mailing of the notification.”
• \[I]f the Secretary returns the written disagreement to the claimant . . . the Board decision . . . is now deemed final and . . . the claimant has a new 120-day appeal period beginning with the date of the mailing of the notification.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).