Skip to main content
· 6/4/2001

Joyce Ann Chuchian Martin v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

Citations

  • 251 F.3d 691
  • 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1039
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11549
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,618
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 123
  • 2001 WL 589586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[w]hen a litigant’s conduct abuses the judicial process, dismissal of a lawsuit is a remedy within the inherent power of the court”
  • finding district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a plaintiff’s suit “as a sanction for her repeated perjury”
  • upholding District Court’s decision to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim when it found Plaintiff had willfully withheld information in interrogatory responses and deposition testimony
  • affirming award of costs to defendant, noting that plaintiff filed no objection to defendant’s bill of costs
  • explaining standard of review for sanctions imposed under inherent powers doctrine is abuse of discretion
  • including integrity of court proceedings as one reason to uphold sanction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Magill, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.