· 6/4/2001
Joyce Ann Chuchian Martin v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
Citations
- 251 F.3d 691
- 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1039
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11549
- 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,618
- 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 123
- 2001 WL 589586
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[w]hen a litigant’s conduct abuses the judicial process, dismissal of a lawsuit is a remedy within the inherent power of the court”
- finding district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a plaintiff’s suit “as a sanction for her repeated perjury”
- upholding District Court’s decision to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim when it found Plaintiff had willfully withheld information in interrogatory responses and deposition testimony
- affirming award of costs to defendant, noting that plaintiff filed no objection to defendant’s bill of costs
- explaining standard of review for sanctions imposed under inherent powers doctrine is abuse of discretion
- including integrity of court proceedings as one reason to uphold sanction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hansen, Magill, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.