Skip to main content
· 3/3/2005

Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Citations

  • 399 F.3d 546
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3582
  • 2005 WL 486848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the VE’s testimony provided substantial evidence despite “minor inconsistencies” with DOT information for some, but not all, jobs identified by the VE
  • holding that any error that would not affect the outcome of the proceeding was harmless
  • holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case
  • holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case
  • holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case
  • holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shadur, Ambro, Van Antwerpen Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.