Joy v. Morrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding deliberation may be inferred from the defendant’s statements implying a plan to inflict harm
• recognizing such prejudice must be shown also in civil cases where it is asserted the trial court erred by unduly limiting voir dire
• holding that, to preserve an objection made in chambers for appellate review, a party must renew the objection in court and make a record specifically identifying the action to which the party is objecting and the proper legal grounds supporting the objection
• “The general rule is that unless a plea agreement is embodied in the judgment of a court, a breach of such agreement by the state does not deprive an accused of liberty or any other constitutionally protected interest.”
• “The general rule is that unless a plea agreement is embodied in the judgment of a court, a breach of such agreement by the state does not deprive an accused of liberty or any other constitutionally protected interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).