Joy v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[n]either the Supreme Court nor the Eleventh Circuit has clarified the stage at which the ‘but-for’ standard applies” and comparing Eleventh Circuit cases
• describing why Nassar is applicable to the FLSA's anti-retaliation provision and how some courts have applied Nassar to FLSA-retaliation claims
• \The existence of a tip pool is relevant in the FLSA context only to the extent that it interferes with an employee's ability to retain all of the employee's tips.\
• “If an employer fails to satisfy any of these preconditions, the employer may not claim the tip credit, regardless of whether the employee suffered actual economic harm as a result.”
• “The existence of a tip pool is relevant in the FLSA context only to the extent that it interferes with an employee’s ability to retain all of the employee’s tips.”
• “If an employer fails to satisfy any of these preconditions, the employer may not claim the tip credit, regardless of whether the employee suffered actual economic harm as a result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).