Joy Laskar, Ph.D. v. G.P. \Bud\ Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Accordingly, [the plaintiff’s] federal due process claim did not exist until after Georgia’s state courts dismissed his petition.”
• stating district courts may properly consider public records and certain documents attached to a motion to dismiss in resolving the motion
• describing internal investigation report, hearing with an opportunity to present witnesses, review of the report and hearing, decision to terminate, ability to appeal, and affirmance on appeal and “extensive pre-termination procedures”
• “[E]ven if a plaintiff suffered a procedural deprivation at his administrative hearing, there is no procedural due process violation if the state makes available a means to remedy the deprivation.”
• “Neither Holley [v. Seminole Cnty. Sch. Dist., 755 F.2d 1492 (11th Cir. 1985

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).