Skip to main content
· 10/18/1965

Journigan v. Warden

Citations

  • 240 Md. 707
  • 213 A.2d 578
  • 1965 Md. LEXIS 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the nature of the regulated subject matter in that case — firearm possession — “undoubtedly calls for . . . exclusive state regulation” because a system of localized regulation could lead to confusing and conflicting regulations, thereby creating a great deal of uncertainty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Hammond, Horney, Marbury, Oppenheimer, Prescott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.