Joubert v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues not raised to or ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
• holding that issues not raised to or ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review
• stating that strict compliance with the verified claim requirements was mandatory and had the effect of extending limitations in a suit against the state
• stating that strict compliance with the verified claim requirements was mandatoiy and had the effect of extending limitations in a suit against the state
• holding that because nothing in Section 15-78-70(b) references a limitations period, as part of the Tort Claims Act, it is still subject to the Tort Claims Act’s two-year statute of limitations
• stating that strict compliance with the verified claim requirements was mandatory and had the effect of extending limitations in a suit against the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).