Jott, Inc v. Clinton Charter Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that invalid portions of an ordinance should be severed when “the remaining, valid portions are sufficiently independent and complete” and consistent with the intent of the ordinance
• rejecting ripeness objections and considering constitutional challenges to disputed ordinance, including preemption
• “exhaustion of [administrative] remedies requirement does not apply to a facial challenge to a zoning ordinance”
• “A facial challenge is one that attacks the very existence or enactment of the ordinance; it alleges that the mere existence and threatened enforcement of the ordinance adversely affects all property regulated in the market as opposed to a particular parcel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).