Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where party to post-employment confidentiality agreement was awarded no increased wages, promotions, or access, consideration was inadequate and agreement void
• \It is not always easy to follow Jostens' contentions because its claim \of a trade secret is rather elastic. At times, the claim appears to include the entire CAD/CAM system; at other times, something less.”
• requiring proof that defendants “disclosed or used” a trade secret
• applying Minn. Stat. Ann. § 336.2-2-207(2)(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).