Josie CASEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the content of the hypothetical need only include limitations the ALJ accepts as credible
• holding that a claimant’s new evidence was not material because it did not show a “marked departure from previous examinations” and it “pertain[ed] to a time outside the scope of our inquiry”
• holding that a claimant’s new evidence was not material because it did not show a “marked departure from previous examinations” and it “pertain[ed] to a time outside the scope of our inquiry”
• holding that a claimant’s new evidence was not material because it did not show a “marked departure from previous examinations” and it “pertain[ed] to a time outside the scope of our inquiry”
• holding that a claimant’s new evidence was not material because it did not show a “marked departure from previous examinations” and it “pertain[ed] to a time outside the scope of our inquiry”
• holding that a claimant’s new evidence was not material because it did not show a “marked departure from previous examinations” and it “pertain[ed] to a time outside the scope of our inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).