Skip to main content
· 4/9/2015

Joshua Orcasitas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f), the failure to “accurately name the correct inventors of a claimed invention” on a patent renders the patent invalid
  • “This case presents the ‘rare situation,’ or at least an uncommon one, where the [patent] application and [the applicant’s] affidavit make clear that he did not himself solely invent the subject matter sought to be patented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.