Joshua King v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a testimonial statement is one where the primary purpose of the conversation was to prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal proceedings
• explaining that any error in the admission of evidence that is merely cumulative of other evidence admitted is harmless
• “A party may not object on one ground at trial and raise a different ground on appeal.”
• appellate court will not reweigh evidence or judge the credibility of witnesses
• rejecting defendant’s claim the calls were inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).