Skip to main content
· 2/24/2015

Joshua Dadzie Anaman, s/k/a Joshua E. Dadzie-Anaman v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Citations

  • 64 Va. App. 379
  • 768 S.E.2d 700
  • 2015 Va. App. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a form used by a bank when deciding to credit a cardholder’s 8 The trial court sustained Heisel-Udell’s objection to admitting information received from Chase Bank regarding her father’s account because Virginia Rule of Evidence 2:902(6)(b
  • applying Rule 5A:12(c)(1)(i) to reject a second-level hearsay argument because the appellant “did not include [it] within any of his assignments of error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys, Beales, McCullough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.