Joshua Clay v. Michael Emmi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389 (2015
• holding that involuntary committee’s claim that police used excessive force in restraining him during mental health commitment was governed by objective standard of reasonableness
• stating that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Kingsley v. Hendrickson , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2466 , 2473, 192 L.Ed.2d 416 (2015
• noting that the test “under either amendment,” requires the court to “employ the same objective test for excessive force”
• signaling that post-Kingsley, the Fourteenth Amendment “objectively reasonable” test mirrors the Fourth Amendment test
• describing the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kinglsey v. Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389 (2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).