JOSHUA AUSTIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a federal court sitting in diversity must proceed with caution in making pronouncements about state law” (quotation marks omit- ted)
• “[A] plaintiff must show that her treating physician would not have used the product had adequate warnings been provided.” (citation omitted)
• “Without some indication that Florida intends to recognize so significant a change in the law, a federal court sitting in diversity ought not to do so.”
• first citing Eghnayem v. Bos. Sci. Corp., 873 F.3d 1304, 1321 (11th Cir. 2017), then citing Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Mason, 27 So. 3d 75, 77 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).