Skip to main content
· 10/4/1994

Josh Thudium v. Allied Products Corporation v. Fulton Performance Products, Inc., Third-Party

Citations

  • 36 F.3d 767
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 52
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27629
  • 1994 WL 533596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s decision to allow revised and otherwise previously undisclosed expert testimony at trial because it “did not constitute unfair surprise and was not prejudicial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Henley, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.