Josette F. v. Jaret O. and Jennifer O.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that multiple illegal provisions tainted the entire purpose of the arbitration agreement
• holding an arbitration clause invalid and striking the clause from the contract, where “neither party suggest[ed] that if the arbitration clause is unlawful, the entire contract must be invalidated”
• holding an arbitration clause invalid and striking the clause from the contract, where “neither party suggest[ed] that if the arbitration clause is unlawful, the entire contract must be invalidated”
• finding that where arbitration provision in franchise agreement \reduce[d] the time in which a claim [could] be brought from one year to 90 days or in some cases six months\ it \strip[ped] franchisees\ of their statutorily mandated rights in violation of Gilmer
• “severance is inappropriate when the entire clause represents an ‘integrated scheme to contravene public policy’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).