Skip to main content
· 1/15/1992

Joset M. Cizek v. United States

Citations

  • 953 F.2d 1232
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 406
  • 1992 WL 4126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing for possibility that letter from plaintiff’s counsel to agency might suffice to satisfy notice requirements if not submitted outside limitations period
  • plaintiffs characterization of damages on SF95 as “ongoing” for personal injury claim not sum certain
  • finding claim for “ongoing” personal injury insufficient as sum certain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barrett, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.