Josephs v. Board of Appeals of Brookline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• findings inadequate where they did not reflect specific application of mathematical formulae as required by pertinent bylaw provisions
• variance granted due in part to sloping lot and increased cost of compliance
• board’s findings inadequate, “amount[ing] to little more than a mere recitation of the statutory and by-law standards” and “indicating] that the board did not have sufficient evidence before it to make the necessary findings”
• board's findings inadequate, \amount[ing] to little more 9 than a mere recitation of the statutory and by-law standards\ and \indicat[ing] that the board did not have sufficient evidence before it to make the necessary findings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).