Joseph Young v. James Rabideau and Stephen Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing admission of plaintiff’s prison 18 disciplinary records “as a valid evidentiary method of contradicting his explanations of his ‘unintentional’ actions”
• evidence of an inmate's prior misconduct admissible to rebut inmate's assertion that he grabbed a chain out of a prison guard's hand accidentally, or by reflex

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).