Skip to main content
· 11/15/1901

Joseph Weill & Co. v. Kent

Citations

  • 107 La. 322

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The purchaser of a growing crop being charged with presumptive knowledge of the existence of the privilege of the furnisher of supplies resting upon it, allegations of his having had actual knowledge of such privilege are unnecessary and surplusage, and the disproof of such allegations does not affect the case one way or another. If the petition in the case contained a cause of action previous to such disproof, it still does so.</p> <p>2. A debt “for money and necessary supplies to. make the crop” is privileged on the crop.</p>

Judges: Provosty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.