Joseph v. Federal Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee is not entitled to veterans’ preference in the merit promotion process
• holding that the use of dual an- nouncements does not violate the VEOA
• holding that, when the agency advertised a vacancy under both competitive-examining and merit-promotion procedures, no statutory or regulatory provision required the agency to limit itself to the competitive-examination process in making its final selection
• finding that an employee is not entitled to veterans’ preference in the merit promotion process
• finding that a veteran was given a full opportunity to compete when he applied, was found qualified, and was interviewed for a position but not selected
• finding that the agency did not violate VEOA by utilizing both the competitive examination and merit promotion processes to fill the same position and selecting someone other than the veteran under the merit promotion process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).