Joseph v. Bigelow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[w]e review for errors of law the trial court’s determination that the joinder will not result in substantial prejudice”
• reaching similar conclusion as to the defen- dant’s two bank robberies
• whether the allegations in an indictment are suffi- cient to satisfy the statutory test for joinder is a question of law
• “Defendant has offered no basis to conclude that a trial on properly joined charges could be fundamentally unfair when the joinder does not cause substantial prejudice.”
• “Defendant has offered no basis to conclude that a trial on properly joined charges could be fundamentally unfair when the joinder does not cause substantial prejudice.”
• describing similar- ities in how defendant committed each bank robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).