Joseph Riley v. Frank H. Gray, Supt.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim exists where state procedural mechanism presents an opportunity to raise the claim, and presentation of the claim was not frustrated by a failure of that mechanism
• holding that opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim exists where the state procedural mechanism presents an opportunity to raise the claim, and presentation of the claim was not frustrated by a failure of that mechanism.
• holding that an opportunity for full and fair litigation of a Fourth Amendment claim exists where the state procedural mechanism presents an opportunity to raise the claim, and presentation of the claim was not frustrated by a failure of that mechanism.
• finding that Ohio criminal and appellate rules provide adequate procedural mechanisms for litigating Fourth Amendment claims
• explaining that inquiring as to whether a state court determination was correct “would be inconsistent with Stone”
• explaining that Ohio law permits a criminal defendant to raise fourth amendment claims in a pre-trial motion to suppress and to appeal that ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).